October 29 MRV Project Coordination Call

Time/date: Friday, Oct 29, 2021, 7am PDT / 7:30pm IST

Agenda:

Time allocation

Item

Time allocation

Item

15 min

Taking stock - brief presentation on the progress and status of the project

Plans for next quarter including content creation and dissemination of advisories

Update on partnership with JEEViKA

Update on funding/donor

35 min

Introduction to the baseline framework and the data we are capturing from the field, discussions and action agenda

Expected inputs from partners/outcome of the discussion

  1. How to establish a baseline for emission estimation based on current practises and improve the quality of data

  2. What type of information is needed for the partners to strengthen the approach and impact

  3. What should be our coordination mechanism/frequency of meetings - both at a higher level and at the operational level

10 min

Way forward and timelines till March 2021

Attendees:

DG: Krish, Rikin, Ashu, Ashok, Falguni, Ronali, Gelsey

EDF: Richie

CSISA consortium: Balwinder and Sonam (CYMMYT), Andy McDonald (Cornell)

US Davis: JK Ladha

 

Notes:

  • Update on funding: Last night (Oct 28) we received formal approval/notification from the donor, Sequoia Climate Fund. We expect a grant agreement shortly.

  • Update on partnership: A week ago we received a formal letter of support from JEEViKA.

  • Update on progress on the ground:

    • Ashok presented data summary and details collected (paddy land, urea used, green naturing practices, etc.) - 18 different data parameters. Link to presentation.

    • CSA practices followed currently by farmers: (1) water management (drying after transplanting), (2) green manuring/green gram, (3) application of jeevamrutha/ghanajeevamruta (but not used at large scale) and (4) aware of varietals (long/short term varieties)

    • CSISA MIP for wheat (Rabi 2021): early sowing, zero tillage variety promotion, irrigation mgmt, N optimization

    • DG has video resources available, but some other ones need to be made (short duration varieties, N optimization, water management, zero tillage)

    • Next steps: Kharif data collection (Nov/Dec), training to scale to 1600 farmers (Nov-March), and emission estimates for the initial 250 farmers (Jan)

    • Provide JEEViKA clarity on: proposed activities/advisories, digitization of VRP register, stats of GG estimation, and focus on CSA MRV on GHG emission co-benefits.

    • (Ashu) Data collected may not constitute a good baseline; need support from partners to get the parameters. We have worked with JEEViKA and their VRPs effectively and now we need to thin about where to next beyond Gaya.

    • (Andy): The broad brush recommendations on the slides are ok, but to prioritize need to take into account the geographies since some recommendations are geographic based.

  • Data points discussion - is this enough to make decision on advisories, models, co-benefits, etc.? With this data (currently for 250 farmers, soon for 1500 farmers), what else would the partners need to take the work forward?

    • (Ashu on chat) Data was not self-reported; it was collected by VRPs and validated at the block level by JEEViKA and DG staff

    • Need to take into account which lens to use and for what purpose.

    • Gaps in GHG accounting is water balance information - need to figure how to collect this as it is a driver of GHG emissions

    • Objective of work: (1) scalable model of data collection, (2) use data to quantify GHG emissions, (3) use that info to send advisories and apply practices to reduce GHG emissions

    • Suggestion to set up a technical committee

      • Proposed: Kritee, Balwinder, Sonam, Amresh(?), JK, Andy. From DG - Ashu and Falguni or Ashok.

      • Proposed idea: someone with behavioral science experience.

      • Propose that group is smaller at first

    • (Andy) Is this first analysis an ex-ante assessment of management practices, rather than GHG emissions?

      • Objective is to share with farmers what can be done and costs, not a full blown GHG accounting. This would show the entry points, which is critical.

      • Importance of behavior change rather than project-led interventions

  • Next steps:

    • Tech committee SOW and convening after Diwali

    • Follow up with partners with regards to contracting

 

Related pages