Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this content. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Version History

« Previous Version 4 Next »

Add your comments directly to the page. Include links to any relevant research, data, or feedback.

Status

IN PROGRESS

Impact

HIGH

Driver

Vineet Singh Ashu Sikri (Unlicensed)

Approver

rikin (Unlicensed)

Contributors

Informed

saureen (Unlicensed) Razak K M

Due date

Outcome

Background

Data wallet that can help farmers to control their data is a natural fit for DG with initiatives like MRV, KD enterprise, video extension and FarmStack.

Brainstorming of ideas associated with data wallet can be found here.

Relevant information

Options considered

Option 1: KDE

Option 2: MRV

Option 3: AgNext

Option 4: KDE + CoCo

Option 5: Fasal

Description

FPO uses aggregated data to negotiate w buyers

VRP gathers tracks practices and other indicators, and this is used to estimate GHG emissions

Agnext generates a quality assessment report, DG accesses the report and sends farmers advisories detailing how they can improve their grade

PG officer gathered data shared with VRP to improve production practices

Fasal IoT sensors gather a bunch of farm specific data and use it to deliver advisories

Data Flow

Farmer → PG officer → FPO → Buyer (aggregated)

Farmer → VRP → DG → DNDC → DG → JEEViKA (in the form of an aggregated dashboard)

Farmer → AgNext → DG → Farmer

Farmer → PG officer → FPO → DG → VRP → farmer

Fasal (through IoT) → farmer → Third Party

Pros and cons

(plus)

Low hanging fruit

Value to farmers immediate and tangible

(minus)

More like app permissions than data wallet

Seems like a force fit

(plus)

Individual farmer’s data

Multiple stakeholders and processing

(minus)

Value prop to farmers not concrete today

Added complexity

(plus)

Individual farmer’s data

Already being piloted and interesting potential (advisory)

(minus)

Who plays what role? Not concrete as of now

Added complexity

(plus)

Individual farmer’s data

Low hanging fruit as both systems in DG

(minus)

Value prop to farmers not immediate and tangible

No external party

(plus)

Individual farmer’s data

Maybe the use case in place already

(minus)

IoT streaming data is unchartered territory

Value prop

Estimated effort

LOW

LARGE

LARGE

MEDIUM

LARGE

Ratings top three (A:Ashu, V: Vineet)

A: 1

V: 2

A: 3

V: 3

A: 2

V: 1

Action items

Outcome

  • No labels