Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this content. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Version History

Version 1 Current »

\uD83D\uDCCB Overview

Year Gone By - Review

What we did well

What could have been better

Realisation

  1. No. of customer interactions

  2. New opportunities - deeper interactions in India/ Global

  3. Kenya (KALRO) onboarding

  4. Website/ presentations

  5. Data discovery tool

  6. Steward interim release

  7. FS participant mock release

  8. FAO/ UC Davis use case (outside regular projects)

  9. Indian Govt interactions

  10. TARA use case

  11. Consent collection UI: TARA and E-mircha use case

  12. Legal documents first set

  13. We did some pivots and managed well some not well-defined scenarios

  1. Speed of some features in FS participant

  2. Product design of FS Participant V1

  3. Speed of implementing use cases for FAO/ UC Davis

  4. Interactions on confidential compute

  5. Managed connector with openTEAM

  6. Outcome of Agrimetrics engagement

  7. Working partnerships with HPE/ Microsoft

  8. Publicity: coherent marketing effort

  9. Fertiliser recommendation use case

  10. Clear communication of FS steward as an independent product

  11. Ontology exercise - outcome

  12. ON pilot use case - clear requirement

  1. Clients have vague problem definition and it takes time to define the same and that’s the most time taking step

  2. Self-hosted connector is good but there have at least been three instances of demand for managed connector

  3. Creating even simple connector with all the containerised application still looks tedious - people want templates that can be configured

  4. Usage policy is eye-catching but nobody is able to define very well how they want to use that - that’s not the main pull for people

  5. Confidential compute is still some time away and right now govt is fine with VPC

  6. Steward has product lifecycle independent of participant (connectors) which is independent of consent/ data wallet

  7. We need to up effort for adoption and the different initiatives are:

    1. Setting up stewards and bootstrapping network

    2. Building features that bring convenience over security like templatized/ managed connectors

    3. Creating use cases with more partners - but with as little effort on engineering side as possible

    4. Aggressively enter partnerships and create example Steward to show that product is live

    5. Doing more marketing to create SEO enabled dataset explorer, newsletters, social media posts etc

Retrospective - Detailed

Streams

Start doing

Stop doing

Keep doing

Engineering

  • Develop templatized connectors like GSheet/ MySQL as prioritised/ designed

  • Plan 2 week dev sprints aligned with release plan (backlogs, bugs, feature requests - designs)

  • Bring DevOps practice of fortnightly integration to the main branch

  • Build use case using participant UI with visibility in DG steward instance wherever required

  • Plan core + deployment with one squad and development with another squad

  • Monthly retros

  • Commit to implementation without complete understanding of user stories and design

  • Start implementation without detailing out the set of steps

  • Improper task description/ allocation resulting in lack of visibility of who’s working on what

  • Commit to open ended or vaguely defined problem statements

  • Sit on a bottleneck without specifying the root cause of it

  • Improve single player mode features like dataset explorer/ test bed

  • Improve designs of FS steward/ FS Participant baseline release

  • Support internal use cases and associated custom connectors

  • Continue building consent management backend

Product

  • Processes for user stories → design sprint → design review → features → dev sprint

  • Template docs for release plans, sprints, user stories, PRDs/ epics, architecture

  • Communications/ marketing, business development strategy plans

  • Onboarding/ setup guides

  • Requirement driven features

  • Lookout for business model testing

  • Deployment plan for use cases

  • Quarterly loom video updates

  • Customer funnel and interaction process

  • Monthly Retros

  • Bad Jira tickets and random confluence usage

  • Push for features without clear design review for each user story

  • Weekly sync ups

  • Customer interactions

  • Internal coordination

Product support

  • Revamp presentations

  • Supporting resources (flyers/ use case studies)

  • Process for assessing opportunities

  • Newsletter templates

  • Blog post templates

  • Social media templates

  • Plan out marketing spends as per release

  • Force fit FS - if it is not required, it is not required

  • Commitment to work stream which are not clearly understood by the team ( eg, Agrimetrics)

  • Present FS in conferences

  • Maintain/ upgrade http://farmstack.co website

  • Organise/ brainstorm possible use cases in new or existing geographies

  • Apply for grants if found good

Business Development/ Partnerships

  • Process to reach and onboard new clients

  • Onboard partners as quickly as possible (fill the wall)

  • Map out people and organisations and meeting agenda items for next quarter

  • Lengthy MoUs or too long time to reach a state of action

✅ Action items

Action items for respective team:

  • No labels