Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

Version 1 Next »

Spoke with Anirudh Keny (Biz Dev) on Nov 10.

Next steps:

  • Bootmitra to share whitepaper that details how they are able to remotely measure SOC with a low error rate (<20% and in some cases lower than 5%)

  • POC: DG to share a list of 30 lat/long and plot area from AP / Telangana and Boomitra will send back estimate for SOC% over past 3 years along with potential payments to farmers from sale of carbon offsets

  • Boomitra would like to brainstorm how the carbon farming concept can be communicated to farmers

Intro Presentation

Call Notes:

  • Use multi-spectral remote sensing to generate estimates for SOC at 30cm depth and various other parameters at 10 m resolution.

  • Where model has been calibrated using ground samples, claim <20% error rate, will share whitepaper that provides further detail. For India, model has been calibrated for punjab, haryana, UP, andhra, telangana

  • Use of proceeds for a credit sold for $10 (This is their goal at scale, the actual right now may be different)

    • $5.50 to the farmer

    • $1.50 to the “behavior change expert” This would be DG. Partner that works with farmers to communicate practices that sequester carbon

    • $3 to Boomitra who serves as project developer. Boomitra sells the credit, does MRV via their remote sensing capability, lists the credits with a registry, etc.

  • Standard list of practices that can increase SOC% and thus sequester carbon (see below). Boomitra estimates these can sequester 3 tons per acre per year

    • incorporate crop residue in the soil, intercropping / planting nitrogen fixing crops, proper irrigation, low/no tillage, organic amendments (manure), optimize nitrogen fertilizer usage

  • Credits are not yet registered but the plan is to register via Verra VM042. Apparently, the methodology is being revised to allow for a “dynamic performance benchmark” approach which sounds like an RCT; set up a control and treatment group to prove that the treatment group increases SOC. In process of registering projects in Mexico, North and South India

  • Did not get a great answer on issue of permanence; sounds like Boomitra keeps some buffer pool of credits in reserve and asks farmers to make a pledge to continuing practices for 10 years but once a credit is sold, the risk is on the buyer

  • On additionality, Boomitra claims they will look back upto 5 years

  • Boomitra doesn’t need to see any logs to verify what is happening on the ground and how that translates to CO2e reduction; rely entirely on remote sensing. Just need farm boundary to make their assessment

  • Re: Yara Agoro, Boomitra feels they are targeting the US market (whereas Boomitra is global south) and they don’t have the tech to do MRV at scale (which Boomitra apparently does)

  • Not getting involved in offtake of physical commodity, just payment for increasing SOC. At $10 per credit, the payment may not be enough to incentivize behavior change but expect prices to rise

  • Feel that relying on remote sensing is superior to model based approach (eg, RothC)

  • No labels