Content Comparison

...

...

•  Feedback from ashok (Unlicensed) and Ashu Sikri (Unlicensed) on the feasibility of option 4

Dashboard created by DG which is giving details by VRP/ Video dissemination (form extension department): district, village, FPO, Average yield, crops, # farmers below average, action

optional: district, village, FPO, farmer, yield, request (about input/ improving yield),

can see farmer details who are below the average and contact them.

If we have CoCo data of that farmer, we can probably show that somehow (not initially).

•  Value prop/ user journey

Outcomes:

1. some significant percentage of farmers give consent that I want to get contacted for XYZ thing (input, market, disease management) and want to share the data for same

2. X number of new farmers got contacted by VRP

3. Out of X, Y% found the video or the advisory info relevant and what they wanted

4. Overall A farmers with B % who have found this useful

Fallback:

1. We go back on option 1 - covered in the effort

Process/ User journey:

1. UI/ UX part

   1. basic wireframe will help

2. informed consent works

3. technical stuff - OTP, validating etc

4. Roll out and process

•  Follow up with Lokesh Garg (Unlicensed)Ashu Sikri (Unlicensed)Vineet Singh

Feasibility:

1. Where?

   1. VRPs to be mobilised

      1. Bihar: Jeevika has good cadre

      2. Odisha: CRPs good

   2. FPOs have shown some interest - there is a resource institution attached

      1. Bihar - good FPOs

      2. AP: not sure

      3. Odisha: CYSD - good cadre

2. When?

   1. Crops/ season:

      1. Bihar: Paddy/ Litchi: June/July

      3. Pulses/ millets: October

3. Who are the stakeholders we should speak to?

   1. Program alignment

      1. Bihar - Jeevika

      2. Odisha - already interest from Nabard

Outcome