Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 3 Current »

The book is anchored by Dr Gouri Krishna who was former CEO and MD of BASIX Consulting and Technology Services Ltd. and has experience of working with Co-operatives, Self Help Groups, and Farmer Producer Organisations.

Published Summer 2022

Some interesting excerpts

From Chapter 1 “Journey of FPOs: Understanding Typology and Evolution – An Overview” by MS Sriram (Faculty member, Centre for Public Policy, Indian Institute of Management Bangalore. Email: mssriram@pm.me)

“The other aspect is about the nature of engagement with the organisation and its impact on the sense of ownership. Unlike capital- centric organisations, where there is some element of equity capital invested which can provide the glue to monitor and worry about the fate of the enterprise, in the case of collectives, the engagement with the enterprise is by definition transactional. The enterprise is structured to benefit people who transact more through a better price or bonus. Loyalty and stickiness to an organisation can develop only when these transactions are regular and repeated (as in dairy co-operatives). There is a good scope for members to exhibit strategic behaviour where they may continue membership but do an occasional transaction outside of the collective because it turns out to be lucrative. In such a situation, the collective will have to devise incentive systems that reward the stickiness of transactions. Given the nature of engagement, apart from time, there also has to be an inclination to get into the governance of the organisation. Invariably, we find that in very good collectives it is the manager who devises the rules of engagements that keep the members loyal. It is a peculiar conundrum where the employee of a set-up finds that it is in her long-term employment interests to safeguard the interest of the members rather than the member-owners. The engagement of the employee is much more relationship-based and sticky than the members’ transactional relationship.”


From Chapter 2 “Farmer Producer Organisations” by Anish Kumar and Aneesha Bali (NAFPO)

Total budget allocation for promoting 10,000 FPOs over 9 years (2019/20 to 2027/28) is 6,624 crore INR or ~$828mn. It breaks down to the following:

  1. FPO Formation and Incubation incl CBBO costs (38%): Rs 2.5 million/ FPO for 5 years.

  2. FPO Management Cost (27%): Rs 1.8 million/ FPO for 3 years

  3. Equity grants (23%): Rs 1.5 million/FPO

  4. Credit Guarantee Fund (11%):

  5. Monitoring and data management/MIS Portal (less than 1%)

  6. Capacity Building through Specialized Training institutes (less than 0.5%)

So far, Rs 2,491 million INR or ~$31mn has been released to all IAs (as of summer 2022)


From Chapter 3 “Typology of FPOs: Mapping the Evolutionary Journey”

  1. Promoted under programmes/schemes of the government: SFAC, NABARD, NRLM/MKSP, ODOP (the 10k FPO initiative announced May 2020 fits under here)

  2. Promoted by organisations with sector focused competencies: NSPDT (Poultry), NDS (Dairy), Spices Board, Coconut Development Board,

  3. Promoted by NGOs, social enterprises: PRADAN, Srijan, etc.

  4. Promoted by corporates: Reliance Foundation, Ambuja Cement

  5. Promoted by philanthropic organisations: Deshpande, Mann Deshi, Harsha Trust, etc.

  6. Promoted by farmers: Sahyadri, IOFPCL in Kerala (2500 primary producers, organic and Fairtrade certified)

Promoting institute might be a useful selection criteria as we identify type of groups to work with. Shalu Umapathy (Unlicensed) alesha (Unlicensed)


  • No labels