Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 4 Next »

Dec 3 - This is a really high level post that will get built out in coming weeks that seeks to answer the question of what are some mechanisms by which farmers actually “own” the data network and what does mean, practically.

This page can be read in conjunction with the Cooperatives and DAOs post here.

Two critical things that any organization needs to address is: (i) who benefits from the economic value generated and (ii) how are decisions made; more simply, economics and governance.

Some practical questions include:

  • How does the organization generate economic value and how is that value shared between owners? Even within cooperatives there are different schools of thought on this; Amul prioritizes paying its farmer members more for their milk whereas other groups maximize profits and allocate dividends or patronage back to members

  • What decisions are handled by management vs. a board of directors (and who makes up that board) vs. shareholders directly?

  • Are voting shares allocated on the basis of capital contribution only or some other contribution? Are votings rights one member - one vote or linked to # of shared held

  • What are the sources of capital and what is the link between capital contribution and governance rights? This looks pretty quite for VC funded startups vs. cooperatives

Below are some examples of interesting models that could inform our approach; these will be organized is a more coherent framework in the coming days.

  • Joindata is a data cooperative for dairy farmers in the Netherlands. The Supervisory board, which manages the organization, reports to the General Assembly where all the members are able to vote. There are two sounding boards (tech experts and farmers) which advise the company.

  • BigGreenDao is building a distributed philanthropy whose goal is to make grant-making more inclusive by giving NGOs that receive grants from the philanthropy a role in selecting who to fund going forward. GreenDAO is legally a 501c3 and uses two types of tokens to allocate decision making: an Exec token for committee members to decide how to run the organization and a GovToken given to community members (the Exec committee and also grantees that are selected by GreenDAO) which is used to decide which orgs to fund and how much.

  • The Drivers Cooperative is a driver owned alternative to Uber or Lyft. Drivers elect the leadership group and earn patronage points which entitle them to dividends.

  • Briantrust is a talent marketplace that is owned and controlled by its users; talent (freelancers who do work sourced through the platform), clients (enterprises that are hiring freelancers) and agents (who refer and vet talent and clients) earn tokens (BTRUST) for building the network. Tokens allow participation in product roadmap, staking for bids (demonstrates commitment to clients), special offers, etc.

  • Midata is a data cooperative for health data where users can give consent to share their data for medical research. Its a Switzerland based nonprofit that “operates a data platform, acts as a trustee for data collection and guarantees the sovereignty of citizens over the use of their data.”

  • No labels