Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Proposed use cases:

...

  • Hello, intros as needed

    • Two different ways of interacting - CIMMYT w/ some projects in Mexico, then the One CGIAR digital initiative has some additional use cases (Rwanda, India, etc) \

    • Andrea leads M&E at CIMMYT, ICT for Ag, info systems for data collection, cleaning, ETL processes etc

      • Leads the e-agrology system

    • Jelle leads the bi-lateral projects, hub system in Mexico, localized innovation networks, sustainable agrifood systems program

  • Dive into the more technical questions / clarifications from below

  • VNS:

    • Andrea share data sample and informed consent form they have

    • Andrea to put us in contact with the developers to work directly with

    • Scope out basic product, big and small picture, costs, and share

    • Prepare initial agreement of collaboration - CIMMYT is the owner here (step 1), in parallel we do the concept note with Dalberg

    • Set up recurring call to move this forward, create the requirements in a solution sketch, then come to how we will execute, baseline targets, and costs associated

    • Identify focal people from both sides, including who can address tech q’s for CIMMYT

      • What to do about the concept note with Dalberg? Focus on the use cases for now, or work on that concept note in parallel

        • Potentially focus on the use cases and drop the concept note

        • Or, if we pursue the concept note - more closely tie it with these use cases, understanding the other potential challenges this same solution can address?

  • We need to look at the level of effort which will be required from our team and determine if it is feasible to pursue this first phase pro-bono, on this timeline. We’ll come back with some specific options.

...

  1. What data sets and who are providers/ consumers? - Sample if available would be good.

    1. Providers = farmers, consumers = private companies and researchers (in the future?)

    2. Ask for sample data

      1. Around 500 variables per plot

      2. up to 3 crops per season

    3. What is the current approach for collecting consent? Is there a need for our support there to build in consent manager to e-Agrology

      1. Extension agent reads a general consent to the farmer when collecting the data

      2. In order to share that data on to donors they must go back to the farmer one by one to collect additional consent from the farmers

      3. Their need here is that sometimes the data requested by the donor is different - like relating yield with practices used etc, which needs specific informed consent

        1. Maybe they can do a more general high level consent to share with 3rd party individually, but tbd. trying to get back to farmers with concrete benefits for sharing that data.

      4. Agro-tutor is interface for the farmer, this will include privacy / consent built in >>> this is kind of a wallet, could push to it

        1. Opp to build in SDK (data wallet, consent, etc)

      5. Right now the donor has access to the general dashboards, but the outside access to the more dynamic dashboards need some control on the data sharing

  2. Where do the data sets reside? 

    • If servers then:

      • logistics of installing the FS instance

      • It is better that someone in our team is given access

      • They will need to maintain the access control and firewall setting

      • There are always surprises here - so if in the initial case this can be avoided then better

    • If public cloud like AWS/ Azure/ GCP then:

      • We create an test instance and give them the image

  3. Data access:

    • If APIs - any documentation or swagger hub link

    • If DB query - then access to the DB test instance

    • If file - then who will be uploading

  4. Data pipeline view:

    • What are the triggers for data sharing to start? - push vs pull 

      • When is data collected – you said twice per year, when exactly so we can understand the timeline better

        • Collection is May - Nov, by november have sharing in place

    • Custom applications to be written

...

  • Can we discuss the engagement in blog / social media? We can include a line on this in the collab agreement if needed, but we like to share these kinds of partnerships with our community

    • Outline it in the collab agreement and collaborate with their comms on messaging

VNS:

  • Shreya to share latest version of collab agreement w/ markups and notes (unless there is no newer version of this)

    • Add the list of tasks outlined to the agreement and share, it will take time

  • Andrea to share text of the consent form

  • DG team to put together the story boarding based on this

  • Andrea to get Vineet / etc in contact with AWS partner to look at SMS integration

  • Andrea to bring project team into the discussion to get their input on donor needs, consent mgr flow, interface with farmers etc

    • Vineet to provide some days / times which work to connect with these teams

      • 1.5 hours for overview and tech architecture

      • ~45 minutes for the project team to understand what the farmers / beneficiaries will get out of the process, Andrea to present

...