Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Attendees: Bhabna, Chandan, Ritesh, Ronali Pradhan (Unlicensed) Kunal Tiwari (Unlicensed) Rubesh sanjeev (Unlicensed) ashok

See meeting minutes

View file
nameMOM Internal FPO Workshop 14th March.pdf

See presentation

View file
nameFPO Presentation ATLAS.pptx

Next Steps

  • Connect on Wed, March 16 to discuss entry point ideas and agenda + logistics for FPO workshop

Notes

  • Udyog Mitras play a critical role in collecting data and maintaining records at the level of a PG; this is a separate cadre from CRPs; Paid ~1k per month and OLM provides funding for 3 years

  • GPLF (Gram Panchayat Level Federation) responsible for recruiting, managing and paying Udyog Mitras

  • SHGs → SHG members form a village/cluster level federation (called a Village Org in Jharkhand) -> CLF members form Gram Panchayat Level Federation (GPLF).

  • Mandatory for PG member to be in a SHG But their families can also join PGs

  • Landless farmers can also join

  • Each district has their own monitoring template which is completed by Udyog Mitras; Odisha team will capture some samples and share

  • Size of PG varies from 20 to 50; 15 to 20 PGs form a FPC

  • Lack of trust among farmers that FPO can bring buyers of sufficient volume. Some notable exceptions to this like ORMAS creating a market for mangoes

  • Areas to focus

    • Clarify roles and responsibilities of FPO leadership, BOD, members

    • Data management; OLM is looking for a solution, currently everything is paper-based / manual

    • Market linkage; FPOs wont see member stickiness until sales happen

    • Better awareness of govt schemes / programs

  • OLM and NABARD provide working capital but that amount is not sufficient and FPOs are not really driving sales

  • FPOs not currently dealing w inputs, farmers are buying direct from local traders